- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-134/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Eisenstadt (Austria) lodged on 11 March 2020 — IR v Volkswagen AG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0134
62020CN0134
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 271/21
(Case C-134/20)
(2020/C 271/29)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: IR
Defendant: Volkswagen AG
Questions referred
a)Is Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information to be interpreted as meaning that the equipment of a vehicle, within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Regulation No 715/2007, is inadmissible if the exhaust gas recirculation valve (i.e. a component that is likely to affect emissions performance) is designed in such a way that the exhaust gas recirculation rate (i.e. the portion of the exhaust gas being recirculated) is regulated in such a way that the valve ensures a low-emission mode only between 15 and 33 degrees Celsius and only below an altitude of 1 000 m, and, outside this temperature window, per 10 degrees Celsius, and above an altitude of 1 000 m, per 250 metres of altitude, the rate decreases in a linear way down to zero, meaning that NOx emissions increase beyond the limits of Regulation No 715/2007?
b)Is it relevant to the assessment of Question a) whether the equipment referred to in Question a) is necessary to protect the engine against damage?
c)Furthermore, is it relevant to the assessment of Question b) whether the part of the engine which is to be protected against damage is the exhaust gas recirculation valve?
d)Is it relevant to the assessment of Question a) whether the equipment of the vehicle referred to in Question a) was already installed when the vehicle was produced or whether the regulation of the exhaust gas recirculation valve described in Question a) is to be installed in the vehicle by way of a repair within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Directive 1999/44/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees?
(1) OJ 2007 L 171, p. 1.
(2) OJ 1999 L 171, p. 12.