- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-143/22, ADDE and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE) and Others v Ministre de l’Intérieur (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Border control, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Article 32 — Temporary reintroduction of border control by a Member State at its internal borders — Article 14 — Refusal of entry — Equation of internal borders with external borders — Directive 2008/115/EC — Scope — Article 2(2)(a))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0143
62022CA0143
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/629
13.11.2023
(Case C-143/22, (1) ADDE and Others)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Border control, asylum and immigration - Regulation (EU) 2016/399 - Article 32 - Temporary reintroduction of border control by a Member State at its internal borders - Article 14 - Refusal of entry - Equation of internal borders with external borders - Directive 2008/115/EC - Scope - Article 2(2)(a))
(C/2023/629)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE), Association nationale d’assistance aux frontières pour les étrangers (ANAFE), Association de recherche, de communication et d’action pour l’accès aux traitements (ARCAT), Comité inter-mouvements auprès des évacués (Cimade), Fédération des associations de solidarité avec tou.te.s les immigré.e.s (FASTI), Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigrés (GISTI), Ligue des droits de l’homme (LDH), Le paria, Syndicat des avocats de France (SAF), SOS — Hépatites Fédération
Defendant: Ministre de l’Intérieur
intervening party: Défenseur des droits
Operative part of the judgment
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) and Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals,
must be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State has reintroduced controls at its internal borders, it may adopt, in respect of a third-country national who presents himself or herself at an authorised border crossing point situated on its territory and where such controls are carried out, a decision refusing entry, by virtue of an application mutatis mutandis of Article 14 of that regulation, provided that the common standards and procedures laid down in that directive are applied to that national with a view to his or her removal.
(1) OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/629/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *