- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-630/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Strobl v Commission (Appeal — Public service — Officials — Recruitment — Open competition — Candidates whose names are included in a list of suitable candidates prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Notice of vacancy — Appointment — Grading under the new, less favourable rules — Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Error in law — Obligation to state reasons on the part of the Civil Service Tribunal)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0630
62011TA0630
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.1.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 26/43
(Case T-630/11 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Public service - Officials - Recruitment - Open competition - Candidates whose names are included in a list of suitable candidates prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Notice of vacancy - Appointment - Grading under the new, less favourable rules - Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Error in law - Obligation to state reasons on the part of the Civil Service Tribunal)
2013/C 26/83
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Peter Strobl (Besozzo, Italy) (represented by: H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer); and Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Herrmann and A. Jensen, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case F-56/05 Strobl v Commission [2011] ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Peter Strobl to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the course of the present proceedings;
3.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.