- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-665/19: Action brought on 30 September 2019 — Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO (€$)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0665
62019TN0665
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.11.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/91
(Case T-665/19)
(2019/C 399/110)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska, legal counsel, and K. Gajek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark €$ — Application No 13 839 998
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 July 2019 in Case R 1345/2018-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
—Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.