- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-166/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 29 September 2008 — Powderject Research v OHIM (POWDERMED) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark POWDERMED — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TB0166
62006TB0166
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 327/24
(Case T-166/06)
(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark POWDERMED - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2008/C 327/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Powderject Research Ltd (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Bryson, Barrister, and P. Brownlow, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 April 2006 (Case R 1189/2005-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign POWDERMED as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Powderject Research Ltd shall pay the costs.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.