EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-706/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 17 November 2022 — Konzernbetriebsrat der O SE & Co. KG

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0706

62022CN0706

November 17, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/16

(Case C-706/22)

(2023/C 71/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant, appellant and appellant on a point of law: Konzernbetriebsrat der O SE & Co. KG

Intervener: Vorstand der O Holding SE

Questions referred

1.Is Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001, in conjunction with Articles 3 to 7 of Directive 2001/86/EC, to be interpreted as meaning that, where a holding SE is formed by participating companies which do not employ employees, and do not have subsidiaries employing employees, and the holding SE was registered in the register of a Member State (a so-called ‘SE without employees’) without a negotiation procedure for the involvement of employees in the SE having first been conducted, under that directive that negotiation procedure has to be conducted retrospectively if the SE becomes the controlling undertaking of subsidiaries in several Member States of the European Union which employ employees?

2.If the Court’s answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: Is the retrospective conduct of the negotiation procedure in such a case possible and necessary for an unlimited time?

3.If the Court’s answer to Question 2 is in the affirmative: Does Article 6 of Directive 2001/86 preclude the application of the law of the Member State where the SE now has its registered office for the purpose of retrospective conduct of the negotiation procedure if the ‘SE without employees’ was registered in the register in another Member State without such a procedure having first been conducted and before the transfer of its registered office became the controlling company of subsidiaries in several Member States of the European Union which employ employees?

4.If the Court’s answer to Question 3 is in the affirmative: Is this also the case where the State where that ‘SE without employees’ was first registered has withdrawn from the European Union after the transfer of the registered office and its law no longer contains any provisions on the conduct of a negotiation procedure for the involvement of employees in the SE?

Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European company (SE) (OJ 2001 L 294, p. 1).

Council Directive 2001/86/EC of 8 October 2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company with regard to the involvement of employees (OJ 2001 L 294, p. 22).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia