- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-7/12: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 October 2013 — Aristidis Psarras v ENISA (Civil Service — Member of temporary staff — Appraisal — Annual appraisal for 2009 — Career development report — Application for annulment of the career development report — Act adversely affecting the applicant — Action manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012FB0007
62012FB0007
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.1.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 9/29
(Case F-7/12)(1)
(Civil Service - Member of temporary staff - Appraisal - Annual appraisal for 2009 - Career development report - Application for annulment of the career development report - Act adversely affecting the applicant - Action manifestly inadmissible)
2014/C 9/47
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Aristidis Psarras (Heraklion, Greece) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (represented by: E. Maurage, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Application for the annulment of the applicant’s staff report for 2009 and the decision establishing the list of officials promoted in 2010 and, if necessary, the decision rejecting the applicant’s claim of 17 October 2011.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Psarras.
(1)
OJ C 133, 5.5.2012, p. 20.