- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-375/23: Order of the General Court of 20 March 2025 – Di Prinzio v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 150/2022 on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any basis in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0375
62023TB0375
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/3052
10.6.2025
(Case T-375/23)
(Law governing the institutions - Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 150/2022 on pensions - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Competence of the author of the act - Obligation to state reasons - Acquired rights - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Right to property - Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part - Action in part manifestly lacking any basis in law)
(C/2025/3052)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Clara Di Prinzio, as heir of Sergio Camillo Segre (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, Agents)
Re:
By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of 12 May 2023 of the Head of the Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit of the European Parliament’s Directorate-General (DG) for Finance concerning the adjustment of Mr Sergio Camillo Segre’s pension following the adoption of decision No 150/2022 of 3 March 2022 by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy).
Operative part of the order
The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly outside the jurisdiction of the General Court, and in part manifestly lacking any basis in law.
Ms Clara Di Prinzio shall bear, in addition to her own costs, those incurred by the European Parliament.
—
(1)
OJ C C/2023/21, 9.10.2023.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3052/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—