- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-226/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat — Relative ground for refusal — Descriptive nature — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0226
62020TA0226
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.5.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 206/24
(Case T-226/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat - Relative ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 206/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Steinel GmbH (Herzebrock-Clarholz, Germany) (represented by: M. Breuer and K. Freudenstein, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2020 (Case R 2472/2019-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MobileHeat as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Steinel GmbH to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140