- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-56/13: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe v European Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0056
62013TB0056
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.10.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 298/6
(Case T-56/13)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Access to documents of the institutions - Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 298/10
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); and Stichting BirdLife Europe (Zeist, Netherlands) (represented by: O. Brouwer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agent)
Re:
Application for the annulment of the Commission’s implied decision to refuse the applicants access to a document concerning European Union energy policy.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.