I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment - European System of Financial Supervision - Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law - Recommendation of EIOPA on actions to be taken to comply with EU law - Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4463)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: A. Börner, S. Henrich and S. Förster, lawyers)
Defendant: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (represented by: A. Terstegen-Verhaag and S. Dispiter, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the recommendation of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) of 16 May 2022, addressed to Národná banka Slovenska, on actions necessary to comply with Directive 2009/138/EC.
The action is dismissed.
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Slovak Republic and of the European Commission.
Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.
Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa, EIOPA, the Slovak Republic and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.
—
(1)
OJ C, C/2024/3622, 17.6.2024.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4463/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—