I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Community design - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - Registered Community design representing decorative graphical symbols - Earlier design - Ground for invalidity - Disclosure of earlier design - Lack of novelty - Articles 5, 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002))
(2016/C 305/44)
Language of the case: Czech
Applicant: Thun 1794 a.s. (Nová Role, Czech Republic) (represented by: F. Steidl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Adekor s.r.o. (Loket, Czech Republic) (represented by: V. Dohnalová, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2015 (Case R 1465/2014-3) relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Thun 1794 and Adekor.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Thun 1794 a.s. to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.