EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-525/20: Action brought on 14 August 2020 — ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0525

62020TN0525

August 14, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/38

(Case T-525/20)

(2020/C 390/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ITD, Brancheorganisation for den danske vejgodstransport (Padborg, Denmark) and Danske Fragtmænd A/S (Åbyhøj, Denmark) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul European Commission Decision C(2020) 3006 final of 12 May 2020 in State aid case SA. 52489 (2018/FC) — Denmark, and in State aid case SA. 52658 (2018/FC) — Sweden (Alleged State aid to PostNord Logistics);

order the Commission to pay the applicants costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on a single plea in law, alleging that the Commission infringed its obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure.

The applicants refer to evidence of serious difficulties relating to the length and the circumstances of the preliminary investigation procedure;

The applicants further refer to an insufficient and incomplete analysis by the defendant regarding the imputability of the capital injection and in particular to:

insufficient and incomplete analysis as the Commission has not relied on accurate, reliable and consistent data;

serious difficulties showed by the fact that the Commission erred when determining that the decision to grant the capital injection was adopted by PostNord Group AB and not by PostNord AB;

serious difficulties showed by the fact that the Commission erred when determining that the decision of PostNord AB’s Board of Directors to grant the capital injection is not imputable to the Danish and Swedish States.

The applicants finally refer to insufficient and incomplete analysis regarding the cross-subsidisation of PostNord Logistics’s costs by Post Danmark A/S.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia