- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-367/10 P: Order of the Court of 31 March 2011 — EMC Development AB v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European cement market — Action for annulment of a decision rejecting a complaint against the adoption of a harmonised standard for cement — Procedure for the adoption of the standard — Binding nature of the standard — Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CB0367
62010CB0367
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.8.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/9
(Case C-367/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European cement market - Action for annulment of a decision rejecting a complaint against the adoption of a harmonised standard for cement - Procedure for the adoption of the standard - Binding nature of the standard - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
2011/C 252/17
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: EMC Development AB (represented by: W.-N. Schelp, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Bourke, Agent)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2010 in Case T-432/05 EMC Development v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action seeking the annulment of the Commission's decision of 28 November 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint based on Article 2(2) of Regulation No 17 and concerning alleged concerted practices on the part of European Portland cement producers consisting of the adoption of a European standard for cement (EN 197-1) aimed at excluding from the market products and technologies of competitors
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.EMC Development AB shall pay the costs.
Language of the case: English
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.