- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-790/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Novolipetsk Steel v Commission (Measures that the European Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures — Importation of cold-rolled flat steel products and hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel — Modification of regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on products subject to safeguard measures — Principle of non-discrimination — Manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0790
62019TA0790
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.12.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 502/20
(Case T-790/19) (*)
(Measures that the European Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures - Importation of cold-rolled flat steel products and hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel - Modification of regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on products subject to safeguard measures - Principle of non-discrimination - Manifest error of assessment)
(2021/C 502/30)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Novolipetsk Steel PAO (Lipetsk, Russia) (represented by: E. Gergondet and P. Vander Schueren, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1382 of 2 September 2019 amending certain Regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on certain steel products subject to safeguard measures (OJ 2019 L 227, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Novolipetsk Steel PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
* * *
(*) Language of the case: English.