- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-45/18: Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Novenco Building & Industry v EUIPO — Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) (NOVENCO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark NOVENCO — Earlier EU word mark Novenco — Cancellation of the international registration — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0045
62018TB0045
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/69
(Case T-45/18) (*)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark NOVENCO - Earlier EU word mark Novenco - Cancellation of the international registration - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2019/C 44/90)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Novenco Building & Industry A/S (Næstved, Denmark) (represented by: A. Rasmussen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) Co. Ltd (Beijing, China) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)
Re:
First, an action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2017 (Case R 2354/2016-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Novenco Building & Industry and Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) and, second, a cross-claim made against that same decision.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the main action or on the cross-claim.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.