- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-434/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 18 July 2017 — Human Operator Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0434
62017CN0434
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.9.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 318/10
(Case C-434/17)
(2017/C 318/15)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Human Operator Zrt.
Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság
Question referred
Must Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2349 of 10 December 2015 be interpreted as precluding the Hungarian practice of considering that the provision of national law, approval of which derives from the abovementioned Implementing Decision and which establishes a derogation from Article 193 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC, entered into force on 1 January 2015, the date from which it must be applied, when that Implementing Decision contains no provision concerning retroactivity of its effects or of its applicability and, in its request for authorisation to establish the derogation, Hungary indicated that date as the date of application?
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2349 of 10 December 2015 authorising Hungary to apply a measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax; OJ 2015 L 330, p. 53.
* * *