EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-595/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v European Commission, Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Entity controlling 100 % of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0595

62018CA0595

January 27, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.3.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/5

(Case C-595/18 P)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Market allocation in connection with projects - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company - Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence - Entity controlling 100 % of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company)

(2021/C 88/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (represented by: A. Mangiaracina, avvocatessa, and J. Koponen, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, C. Sjödin, T. Vecchi and J. Norris, acting as Agents), Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (represented by: C. Tesauro and L. Armati, avvocati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal.

2.Orders The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3.Orders Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia