I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-289/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(State aid - Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 - Investment subsidies granted by the Île-de-France region - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and of ‘new aid’ - Article 107 TFEU - Article 108 TFEU - Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Limitation period - Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)
(2019/C 305/48)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Keolis CIF (Le Mesnil-Amelot, France) and the seven other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the judgment (represented by: R. Sermier and D. Epaud, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1470 of 2 February 2017 on aid schemes SA.26763 2014/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France for bus transport undertakings in the Île-de-France region (OJ 2017 L 209, p. 24).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Keolis CIF and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019305EN.01004001-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019305EN.01004001-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.
* * *