- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-826/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 22 December 2021 — Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Societatea Națională de Transport Feroviar de Călători (SNTFC) ‘CFR Călători’ SA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0826
62021CN0826
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.5.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/8
(Case C-826/21)
(2022/C 191/11)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant at first instance and appellant: Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR)
Defendant at first instance and respondent: Societatea Națională de Transport Feroviar de Călători (SNTFC) ‘CFR Călători’ SA
Questions referred
1.Does a rail carrier which uses train carriages in which sound systems intended for the communication of information to passengers are installed thereby make a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1)?
2.Does Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society preclude national legislation which establishes a rebuttable presumption of communication to the public on the basis of the existence of sound systems, where those sound systems are required by other provisions of law governing the carrier’s activity?
Language of the case: Romanian
(1) OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.