- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-821/19: Action brought on 2 December 2019 — Herlyn and Beck v EUIPO — Brillux (B.home)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0821
62019TN0821
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.1.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/70
(Case T-821/19)
(2020/C 27/71)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicants: Sonja Herlyn (Grünwald, Germany), Christian Beck (Grünwald) (represented by: H. Hofmann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Brillux GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicants
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU trade mark B.home — Application for registration No 16 961 336
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 September 2019 in Case R 373/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul or amend the contested decision and uphold the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in proceedings B2976549 of 10 December 2018;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs;
—set a date for an oral hearing.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.