I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2008/C 142/66)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, United States) (represented by: S. Schäffler, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: aRigen, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 February 2008 in case R 809/2007-2; and
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Applicant for the Community trade mark: aRigen, Inc
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Sorvir’ for goods in class 5 — application No 004 455 507
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited: The word mark ‘NORVIR’ for goods in class 5
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the marks in question are similar and thus likely to cause confusion.