- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-23/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 February 2012 — AY v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2010 promotion exercise — Consideration of comparative merits — Failure to take into account further training and certification — Error of law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FB0023
62011FB0023
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.4.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 126/26
(Case F-23/11)(1)
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2010 promotion exercise - Consideration of comparative merits - Failure to take into account further training and certification - Error of law)
2012/C 126/49
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: AY (Bousval, Belgium) (represented initially by É. Boigelot and S. Woog, then by É. Boigelot, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision of the Council not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST 9 in the 2010 promotion exercise and compensation for the non-material harm suffered.
Operative part of the order
The Tribunal:
1.annul the decision of the Council of the European Union not to promote AY to grade AST 9 in the 2010 promotion exercise;
2.declares that there is no need to adjudicate on AY’s alternative heads of claim;
3.dismisses AY’s action as to the remainder;
4.orders the Council of the European Union to pay all costs.
(1)
OJ 30.7.2011 C 226, p. 31.