- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-517/19 INTP: Order of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — Homoki v Commission (Interpretation of a judgment — Inadmissiblity)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0517
62019TB0517
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/43
(Case T-517/19 INTP) (*)
(Interpretation of a judgment - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 463/61)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: Andrea Homoki (Gyál, Hungary) (represented by: T. Hüttl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Béres and A. Spina, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her application under Article 168 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the applicant asks the General Court to interpret the judgment of 1 September 2021, Homoki v Commission (T-517/19, not published, EU:T:2021:529).
Operative part of the order
1.The request for interpretation is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Ms Andrea Homoki is ordered to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: Hungarian.
[Signatures]
* * *
(*) Language of the case: Hungarian.