- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-347/24: Action brought on 10 July 2024 – Target Brands v EUIPO – Polipol Polstermöbel (Device of red and white concentric rings)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0347
62024TN0347
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5115
26.8.2024
(Case T-347/24)
(C/2024/5115)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Target Brands, Inc. (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and A. Malkmes, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Polipol Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG (Diepenau, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Device of red and white concentric rings) – European Union trade mark No 17 882 844
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2024 in Case R 1275/2022-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and, if Polipol Polstermöbel intervenes, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5115/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—