I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
European Court reports 2001 Page I-02785
In this case the Commission seeks a declaration pursuant to Article 226 EC that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law by subjecting storage water heaters to safety conditions not prescribed by Council Directive 73/23/EEC of 19 February 1973 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits, and thus not recognising the presumption of compliance with safety conditions of products manufactured in accordance with standard EN 60335-2-21.
Essentially the Commission contends that Italy imposes a requirement that storage water heaters are fitted with a mechanism which cuts off the electricity supply when the water temperature reaches 100° C, while the Community legislation allows a maximum of 130° C.
The Italian Government does not contest the infringement and states that it will seek to put an end to the infringement as soon as possible.
In those circumstances the Court should in my opinion:
(1)declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law by subjecting storage water heaters to safety conditions not prescribed by Council Directive 73/23/EEC of 19 February 1973 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits, and thus not recognising the presumption of compliance with safety conditions of products manufactured in accordance with standard EN 60335-2-21;
(2)order Italy to pay the costs.