- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-2/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Bio-tec Biologische Naturverpackungen (BIOPLAST BIOPLASTICS FOR A BETTER LIFE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark BIOPLAST BIOPLASTICS FOR A BETTER LIFE — Earlier EU word mark BIOPLAK — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0002
62020TA0002
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.12.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 433/49
(Case T-2/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark BIOPLAST BIOPLASTICS FOR A BETTER LIFE - Earlier EU word mark BIOPLAK - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 433/62)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and E. Śliwińska, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Bio-tec Biologische Naturverpackungen GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2019 (Case R 418/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ern and Bio-tec Biologische Naturverpackungen.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Laboratorios Ern, SA to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.