- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-583/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — criminal proceedings against MV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Article 3(1) — Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State — Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions — National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence — Multiple offences — Determination of an aggregate sentence — Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences — Article 3(5) — Exception — Offence committed before the handing down or execution of sentences in another Member State)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0583
62022CA0583
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.2.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/12
(Case C-583/22 PPU) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA - Article 3(1) - Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State - Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions - National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence - Multiple offences - Determination of an aggregate sentence - Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences - Article 3(5) - Exception - Offence committed before the handing down or execution of sentences in another Member State)
(2023/C 71/14)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Party in the main proceedings
Intervening party: Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 3(1) and (5) of Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA of 24 July 2008 on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings
must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State is not required, in criminal proceedings brought against a person, to attach to previous convictions handed down in another Member State, against that person and in respect of different facts, effects equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions in accordance with the rules of the national law concerned relating to the formation of a cumulative sentence where, first, the offence giving rise to those previous proceedings was committed before the previous convictions were handed down and, secondly, taking account of the previous convictions in accordance with those rules of national law would prevent the national court hearing the proceedings from imposing a sentence that could be executed against the person concerned.
2.The second subparagraph of Article 3(5) of Framework Decision 2008/675
must be interpreted as meaning that the taking into account of previous convictions handed down in another Member State, within the meaning of that provision, does not require the national court to establish and give specific reasons for the disadvantage resulting from the impossibility of imposing a subsequent cumulative sentence which is laid down for earlier national convictions.
Language of the case: German