- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-612/22: Order of the General Court of 28 March 2023 — Primicerj v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Initial refusal of access — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility — Request for the Court to issue directions — Lack of jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0612
62022TB0612
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/49
(Case T-612/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Initial refusal of access - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility - Request for the Court to issue directions - Lack of jurisdiction)
(2023/C 179/72)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Paola Primicerj (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Iorio, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina, acting as Agent)
Re:
By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission’s decision of 2 August 2022 refusing her request for access to the supplementary letter of formal notice of 15 July 2022, issued by the Commission to the Italian Republic in the context of infringement procedure 2016/4081, relating to the compatibility with EU law of the national law governing the services provided by magistrati onorari (honorary judges).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed in part on the ground of clear lack of jurisdiction and in part for being manifestly inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Mr Gabriele Di Girolamo, Ms Roberta Tesei and the Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (ANGDP).
3.Ms Paola Primicerji shall pay the costs.
4.Mr Di Girolamo, Ms Tesei and the ANGDP shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.