- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-774/22, FTI Touristik (International element): Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg – Germany) – JX v FTI Touristik GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 18 – Jurisdiction over consumer contracts – Determination of the international and territorial jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State – International element – Travel in a third State)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0774
62022CA0774
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5770
(Case C-774/22,
FTI Touristik (International element))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Article 18 - Jurisdiction over consumer contracts - Determination of the international and territorial jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State - International element - Travel in a third State)
(C/2024/5770)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: JX
Defendant: FTI Touristik GmbH
Operative part of the judgment
Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
must be interpreted as meaning that it determines both the international and the territorial jurisdiction of the court of a Member State in whose judicial district the consumer is domiciled, where such a court is seised, by that consumer, of a dispute between that consumer and a tour operator following the conclusion of a package travel contract, and where those two contracting parties are both domiciled in that Member State, but where the destination of that travel is abroad.
—
(1) OJ C 112, 27.3.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5770/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—