- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-223/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2017 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark DriCloud — Earlier international word marks ICLOUD — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Submission of evidence out of time — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0223
62016TA0223
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 283/42
(Case T-223/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark DriCloud - Earlier international word marks ICLOUD - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Submission of evidence out of time - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2017/C 283/63)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Massive Bionics, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Galindo Martens, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States) (represented by: J. Olsen and P. Andreottola, Solicitors, and G. Tritton, Barrister)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2016 (Case R 339/2015-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Apple and Massive Bionics.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Massive Bionics, SL to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.