- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-682/17: Action brought on 2 Octobre 2017 — Khadi and Village Industries Commission v EUIPO — BNP Best Natural Products (khadi Naturprodukte aus Indien)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0682
62017TN0682
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.11.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 402/52
(Case T-682/17)
(2017/C 402/69)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Khadi and Village Industries Commission (Mumbai Maharashtra, India) (represented by: J. Guise, N. Rose, V. Ellis, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BNP Best Natural Products GmbH (Munich, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘khadi Naturprodukte aus Indien’ — EU trade mark No 8 216 343
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2017 in Case R 2085/2016-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and find that the contested EUTM is invalid;
—make an award of costs in the favour of the applicant.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—The Board of Appeal distorted the evidence;
—Infringement of Articles 7(1)(g) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.