- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-160/24: Order of the General Court of 13 January 2025 – LU v EIB (Civil service – EIB staff – Complaint of psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Final report of the investigation panel – Manifest inadmissibility – Decision confirming the findings of the investigation report and recommending the reopening of disciplinary proceedings for malicious complaint – Withdrawal of the contested measure – No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TB0160
62024TB0160
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/1770
31.3.2025
(Case T-160/24)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Complaint of psychological harassment - Administrative inquiry - Final report of the investigation panel - Manifest inadmissibility - Decision confirming the findings of the investigation report and recommending the reopening of disciplinary proceedings for malicious complaint - Withdrawal of the contested measure - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/1770)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: LU (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: K. Carr and J. Pawlowicz, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, in essence, the annulment (i) of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 21 December 2023 and (ii) of the report of 22 March 2023 of the Investigation Panel appointed under the investigation procedure laid down by the Dignity at Work Policy and, secondly, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the first head of claim of LU in so far as it seeks annulment of the decision of the President of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 21 December 2023 or on his second, third, fourth and fifth heads of claim.
2.The action as to the remainder is dismissed.
3.The EIB shall pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3476, 10.6.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1770/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—