- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-514/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark VITROMED Germany — International registration of the earlier figurative mark VITROMED — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0514
62022TA0514
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.7.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 271/29
(Case T-514/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark VITROMED Germany - International registration of the earlier figurative mark VITROMED - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 271/42)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vitromed GmbH (Jena, Germany) (represented by: M. Linß, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vitromed Healthcare (Jaipur, India) (represented by: S. Eble, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2022 (Case R 1670/2021-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Vitromed GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Vitromed Healthcare;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140