I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 337/03)
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicant: SC Casa Noastră SA
Defendant: Ministerul Transporturilor — Inspectoratul de Stat pentru Controlul Transportului Rutier ISCTR
1)To what extent may the expression ‘by whomsoever organised’ used in Article 2(3) of Regulation No 1073/2009 be interpreted as meaning that a regular transport service can be organised by an economic operator for the purpose of carrying its own employees to and from work?
2)To what extent may the expression ‘carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered does not exceed 50 kilometres’, used in Article 3(a) of Regulation No 561/2006 be interpreted as meaning that it applies to workers in connection with their travel to and from the workplace?
Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2009 L 300, p. 88).
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (Text with EEA relevance) — Declaration (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 1).
* * *