- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-64/16: Action brought on 15 February 2016 — Michał Wieromiejczyk v EUIPO (Tasty Puff)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0064
62016TN0064
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.3.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 111/39
(Case T-64/16)
(2016/C 111/47)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Michał Wieromiejczyk (Pabianice, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Tasty Puff’ — Application for registration No 13 072 061
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2015 in Case R 3058/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the action to be well founded;
—annul the contested decision;
—amend the contested decision by requiring EUIPO to grant the right to Trade Mark No 13072061 ‘Tasty Puff’;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
Breach of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.