I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-336/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark NOURISHING PERSONAL HEALTH - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation on OHIM to examine the facts of its own motion - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 398/66)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht and S. Cobet-Nüse, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2014 (Case R 149/2013-4) concerning the international registration designating the European Community of the word mark NOURISHING PERSONAL HEALTH.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Société des produits Nestlé SA to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.