- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-259/16: Action brought on 23 May 2016 — Trost Auto Service Technik v EUIPO (AUTOSERVICE.COM)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0259
62016TN0259
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.7.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 251/45
(Case T-259/16)
(2016/C 251/51)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Trost Auto Service Technik SE (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: P. Kohl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘AUTOSERVICE.COM’ — Application for registration No 13 593 678
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2016 in Case R 1770/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.