I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-32/10) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 90/314/EEC - Package travel, package holidays and package tours - Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court to answer the questions referred)
(2011/C 232/16)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Applicant: Tony Georgiev Semerdzhiev
Defendant: ET Del-Pi-Krasimira Mancheva
Intervening party: ZAD Bulstrad VIG
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Interpretation of Articles 2(1)(c), 4(1)(b)(iv) and 5(2)(3) and (4) of Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours (OJ 1990 L 158, p. 59) — Concept of ‘other tourist services’ not ancillary to transport or accommodation to be borne by the organiser — Obligation for the organiser to conclude an individual insurance contract for each consumer and to provide the consumer with the original before travel — Obligation for the organiser to conclude an individual insurance contract covering costs of repatriation in case of accident — Concept of ‘damage’ resulting for the consumer from the failure to perform or the improper performance of the contract — Non-material damages included
The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to rule on the questions referred by the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria).
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.