- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-369/23, Vivacom Bulgaria: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 June 2023 — ‘Vivacom Bulgaria’ EAD v Varhoven administrativen sad, Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0369
62023CN0369
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.9.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 314/6
(Case C-369/23, Vivacom Bulgaria)
(2023/C 314/08)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant and appellant in cassation: ‘Vivacom Bulgaria’ EAD
Defendants and respondents in cassation: Varhoven administrativen sad, Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite
Question referred
Do the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude national legislation such as Article 2c(1)(1) of the Zakon za otgovornostta na darzhavata i obshtinite za vredi (Bulgarian Law on Liability of the State and of Municipalities for Damage), read in conjunction with Article 203(3) and Article 128(1)(6) of the Administrativnoprotsesualen kodeks (Bulgarian Code of Administrative Procedure), under which an action for compensation for damage caused by an infringement of EU law by the Varhoven administrativen sad (Supreme Administrative Court, Bulgaria), in which the Supreme Administrative Court is the defendant, must be examined by that court at last instance?