EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of 1 October 1997. # Regione Toscana v Commission of the European Communities. # Action for annulment - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Referral to the Court of First Instance. # Case C-180/97.

ECLI:EU:C:1997:451

61997CO0180

October 1, 1997
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61997O0180

European Court reports 1997 Page I-05245

Summary

Keywords

Procedure - Division of powers between the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance - Action for annulment - Actions by Member States - Concept - Action brought before the Court of Justice by a regional authority of a Member State - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice - Referral to the Court of First Instance (EC Treaty, Art. 173; EC Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 47(2); Council Decisions 88/591, 93/350 and 94/149)

Summary

Since the entry into force of Decision 94/149, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice is limited to actions brought by a Member State or by a Community institution.

In that respect, it is clear from the general scheme of the Treaties that the term Member State, for the purposes of the institutional provisions and, in particular, those relating to proceedings before the courts, refers only to government authorities of the Member States of the European Communities and cannot include the governments of regions or of autonomous communities, irrespective of the powers they may have. If the contrary were true, it would undermine the institutional balance provided for by the Treaties, which determine, inter alia, the conditions under which the Member States, that is to say the States party to the Treaties establishing the Communities and the Accession Treaties, participate in the functioning of the Community institutions. It is not possible for the European Communities to comprise a greater number of Member States than the number of States between which they were established.

Accordingly, when an action for annulment is brought before it on the basis of the fourth paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty by a regional authority, which must be considered to be a legal person for the purposes of that provision, the Court of Justice clearly has no jurisdiction to take cognizance of it and must refer it to the Court of First Instance pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 47 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia