- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Rectification order of 3 September 2019.#Guardian Europe Sàrl v European Commission and Court of Justice of the European Union.#Rectification.#Case T-673/15.
ECLI:EU:T:2019:559
62015TO0673
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber, Extended Composition)
3 September 2019 (*1)
(Rectification)
In Case T‑673/15,
Guardian Europe Sàrl, established in Bertrange (Luxembourg), represented by F. Louis, lawyer, and C. O’Daly, Solicitor,
applicant,
European Union, represented by:
(1) European Commission, represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents,
(2) Court of Justice of the European Union, represented by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, acting as Agents,
defendant,
APPLICATION on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant because of, first, the length of the proceedings in the case giving rise to the judgment of 27 September 2012, Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe v Commission (T‑82/08, EU:T:2012:494), and, secondly, the infringement of the principle of equal treatment in Commission Decision C(2007) 5791 final of 28 November 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39165 — Flat glass) and in the judgment of 27 September 2012, Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe v Commission (T‑82/08, EU:T:2012:494),
THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber, Extended Composition),
composed of S. Papasavvas, President, I. Labucka, E. Bieliūnas (Rapporteur), V. Kreuschitz and I.S. Forrester, Judges,
Registrar: E. Coulon,
makes the following
1The Court delivered a judgment on 7 June 2017 (Guardian Europe v European Union, T‑673/15, EU:T:2017:377).
2In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes found in paragraph 64 of that judgment.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) hereby orders:
In paragraph 64 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, ‘… by virtue of abuse of process’ must be read instead of ‘… by virtue of misuse of powers’.
Luxembourg, 3 September 2019.
Registrar
President
*1 Language of the case: English.