I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-545/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration - Application for territorial extension of the protection - Word mark PRESSO - Earlier national word mark PRESSO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 022/34)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Pi-Design AG (Triengen, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Apelt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2015 (Case R 428/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between the Société des produits Nestlé and Pi-Design.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Pi-Design AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.