I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 351/22
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Yoo Holdings Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eckes-Granini Group GmbH (Nieder-Olm, Germany)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2014 given in Case R 762/2013-2.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘YOO’ for the services in Classes 35, 41 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 10 487 924
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and International trade mark registration for the word mark ‘YO’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 32
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the contested decision and upheld the opposition in part
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) CTMR.