- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-672/20: Order of the General Court of 17 May 2021 — Kerstens v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Request for assistance — Rejection of the complaint — Time limit for bringing an action — Starting point — Date on which the person concerned could have known the content of the decision — Delay — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0672
62020TB0672
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.7.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 263/24
(Case T-672/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Request for assistance - Rejection of the complaint - Time limit for bringing an action - Starting point - Date on which the person concerned could have known the content of the decision - Delay - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 263/32)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (La Forclaz, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr, acting as Agent)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decisions of the Commission of 20 and 31 January 2020 rejecting, respectively, the request for assistance D/517/19 and the request for assistance D/516/19 lodged by the applicant pursuant to Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Mr Petrus Kerstens shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.
* * *
Language of the case: French