Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/61

(Case T-83/23)

(2023/C 155/78)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: M. Brzozowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Decision No D 314619 of the President of the European Parliament of 16 December 2022 finding that the applicant had engaged in psychological harassment in relation to an accredited parliamentary assistant;

—order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to good administration;

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

3.Third plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment, failure to fulfil the obligation to state reasons, and breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.