- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2007. # Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Incorrect transposition - Directive 96/61/EC - Article 9(4) - Article 13(1) - Annex I - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Concepts of ‘application of the best available techniques’ and ‘periodic reconsideration of the conditions for an operating permit’. # Case C-263/07.
ECLI:EU:C:2007:745
62007CJ0263
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑263/07)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Incorrect transposition – Directive 96/61/EC – Article 9(4) – Article 13(1) – Annex I – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Concepts of ‘application of the best available techniques’ and ‘periodic reconsideration of the conditions for an operating permit’
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 14)
Re:
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Incorrect transposition of Articles 9(4) and 13(1) of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (OJ 1996 L 257, p. 26) and of Annex I thereto – Concepts of application of the ‘best available techniques’ and ‘periodic reconsideration’ of the conditions for an operating permit.
Operative part
By failing correctly to transpose Articles 9(4) and 13(1) of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, and of Annex I thereto, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is ordered to pay the costs.