- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-118/07: Judgment of the General Court of 18 February 2011 — P.P.TV v OHIM — Rentrak (PPT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PPT — Earlier national figurative mark PPTV — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TA0118
62007TA0118
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 103/19
(Case T-118/07) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PPT - Earlier national figurative mark PPTV - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 103/32
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: P.P.TV — Publicidade de Portugal e Televisão, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: I. de Carvalho Simões and J.M. Conceição Pimenta, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen and, subsequently, D. Botis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Rentrak Corp. (Portland, Oregon, United States)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2007 (Case R 1040/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between P.P.TV — Publicidade de Portugal e Televisão, SA and Rentrak Corp.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders P.P.TV — Publicidade de Portugal e Televisão, SA, to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.