- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-458/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — CIG Pannónia Életbiztosító Nyrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(c) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — Service used by an insurance company to review the accuracy of a diagnosis of serious illness and find and provide the best possible care and treatment abroad)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0458
62021CA0458
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.1.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/11
(Case C-458/21) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 132(1)(c) - Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest - Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions - Service used by an insurance company to review the accuracy of a diagnosis of serious illness and find and provide the best possible care and treatment abroad)
(2023/C 24/14)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: CIG Pannónia Életbiztosító Nyrt.
Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Operative part of the judgment
Article 132(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that services consisting in verifying the accuracy of an insured person’s diagnosis of serious illness, in order to determine the best possible health care with a view to the insured person’s recovery and to ensure, where that risk is covered by the insurance contract and where the insured person so requests, that the medical treatment is provided abroad, are not covered by the exemption provided for in that provision.
(*)
Language of the case: Hungarian
* * *
(2023/C 24/14)