()
2010/C 221/39
Language of the case: Finnish
Applicant: Lotta Gistö
Other party: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö
Is Article 14 of the Protocol (1) to be interpreted in Lotta Gistö’s case as meaning that, in accordance with the provisions of the Protocol, her residence for tax purposes in 2007 is still Finland, or does the Protocol mean in this case that ultimately, however, the provisions of the domestic legislation of the Member State decide the question of general tax liability in a Member State, in this case Finland?
Protocol (No 36) on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities (1965),
OJ 2006 C 321 E, p. 318.